ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion


why not set up a "monitored" sub list and go to it...
just set up some "civil discourse" rules like stef used to have and allow
'RELEVENT"  unlimited posts


ken stubbs


----- Original Message -----
From: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
To: <ross@tucows.com>; <synthesis@videotron.ca>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; <mcade@att.com>; <roessler@does-not-exist.org>;
<Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>; <RJS@lojo.co.nz>;
<nick.wood@nom-iq.com>; <grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz>; <crusso@verisign.com>;
<mcf@uwm.edu>; <orobles@nic.mx>; <james.love@cptech.org>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion


> Thomas,
>
> Ross writes:  I strongly dare the GA to put together a document such as
you
> have described Dan. The TF needs this.
>
> It would be nice to be able to have a sustained back-and-forth discussion
on
> certain topics such as Transfers, but this becomes somewhat difficult when
> trying to work within the daily quota on the GA list.  It would be great
if
> we could post directly to the Task Forces, but unfortunately they prefer
to
> limit our input by filtering our comments through the GA and constituency
> reps.  I have never favored this "filtered" approach, and I would like to
ask
> you to consider the possibility of opening up topic-specific mailing lists
so
> that we can work in earnest on the issues that we need to address.
>
> I am aware of the fact that we can post directly to our "reps", but this
type
> of off-the-record dialogue does not serve the interests of transparency,
nor
> does it stimulate dialogue.
>
> As I see it, we currently need to focus on the following:
>
> WLS
> A Uniform Delete Policy
> Transfer Procedures
> The Board's Bulk WHOIS referral to the DNSO
> Hoarding/Warehousing
> DNSO reform
> ICANN reform
> the Escrow initiative
> WHOIS policy
> Contract enforcement provisions
> IDN policy issues
> Redemption Grace Period evaluation
> New TLD evaluation
> Simulataneous Language Translation TF follow-up
>
> This is quite a work-load, and limitations on posting tend to hamper the
> prospects for efficient progress on the subjects at hand.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>