Re: [ga] Grace and Redemption

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

maybe instead of just talking about the issues , someone should suggest a practical solution to the potential propblem being discussed here..

 

ken stubbs

 

----- Original Message -----

From: L. Gallegos

To: ga@dnso.org

Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:56 PM

Subject: Re: [ga] Grace and Redemption

My point is that the registrant has to use the email address to contact
the system in order to verify the transaction (email verification).  Many
registrants use their domain for email and some even just for email, so
that they do not have to continually change email addresses if they
change ISPs, etc.  So, going to a neighbor to use his email addy is not
going to do anything.  It won't compute.  That has been one of the
bugaboos when people do change email addresses due to ISP
changes, especially when it is due to an ISP failure or other emergency
change.  Suddenly one can't do anything about modifying domain
information and it all has to be done by phone.  With Verisign it is
extremely painful to do anything via phone or fax.  Other registrars do
not even make their phone numbers public - or at least easy to find. 

It is an issue whether some feel otherwise or not.

The telephone or electric bill analogy is not a good one, IMO, since
most people would be able to deal with that simply - by using another
phone.  Verification of an email address is not necessary, nor is
verification of the number from which you are calling.

Leah


On 28 Jun 2002, at 13:54, Dan Steinberg wrote:

> I have to agree. If your phone gets disconnected, it doesnt matter if
> its because you 'thought you had paid' but hadnt or if its turly telco
> error or lost cheque.  You still have to go visit a neighbour, or use a
> cell phone or trundle down to find a pay phone just to establish what
> the problem is and see if you have to do something (like pay). It's your
> repsonisibility to find a way to do this.
>
> William X Walsh wrote:
> >
> > Friday, June 28, 2002, 1:31:08 AM, L. Gallegos wrote:
> >
> > > Well, the board approved it, but I still have a question that no one
> > > seems to have addressed.
> >
> > > If an expired domain is placed on registry hold and no longer resolves,
> > > and the contact email is based on that domain, how will the registrant
> > > be able to "undelete" it or move it to another registrar to redeem it if
> > > there can be no contact?
> >
> > > It seems to me that there should be some resolution to this question or
> > > what good is the Grace and Redemption perioid?  The only other means
> > > to communicate in this scenario, would be by telephone.  Some of the
> > > registrars do not even list their phone numbers on their websites and
> > > there would be little time to handle it via snail mail.
> >
> > > Anyone have any comments?
> >
> > Personal Responsibility.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> > --
> > Save Internet Radio!
> > CARP will kill Webcasting!
> > http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec fax:   (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html