ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-rules]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-rules] Re: Admin note: I have resigned as list monitor


Patrick and all,

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Hi Jeff
>
> >   I didn't mean to be rude just direct.  I am sorry you took my comments
> > as rude.  I don't agree that they did a top job.  After all didn't we just
> > get done with a call for a poor decision regarding Eric?  I think we did.
> > And that is only one of several examples...
>
> Read it again.  In allowing Eric's appeal I carefully said that it was no
> reflection on the decision of the list monitors.  Just that Eric had
> apologised.

  Again I wasn't referring to your part in the incodent regarding Eric.
Please try not to read something into what I stated that is not there,
ok?
I said from my comment above: "didn't we just > get done with a call
for a poor decision regarding Eric?"  Notice the "WE" in that statement?
That "WE" signifies the DNSO GA participants, not you in particular,
or andy ONE participant Patrick.

>
>
> There are no other examples or you would have quoted them..
>
> > >  Nobody could anticipate how many hundreds of
> > > complaints were going to be made.  Just look at all the onlist abuse.
> >
> >   I don't see that much on list abuse.  Than again my opinion of abuse
> > and yours likely differ...
>
> Read it again.  You are not subscribed to [ga-abuse] so cannot know how many
> complaints are made.  The opinions are those of those making the complaints.

  That's right I am not subscribed to the GA-Abuse list.  It is a closed
list.  However I can get any of the posts to that list, any time I wish
to
with the poor security that the DNSO GA server has installed.  So you
have
no idea what I have read or what I have NOT read...  But again I
responded
to your comment: "Just look at all the onlist abuse.", not the ga-abuse
list abuse...

>
>
> >   The reason(s) are many a varied.  But I believe the biggest one is
> > that of inane rules...
>
> The rules say "personal attacks, insults and abuse".  What else?

  Define what an isult is in the context of a Mailing list?  Define what
is a personal attack in terms of a ML and someones comments to it?
Define what is "Abuse" (Boy that is a broad term! ) in terms of
this or any ML in terms that applies to responses or original threads?

  IMHO as well a it seems a number of others, the whole list of rules
for this list is rather vague...

>
>
> > > You would say that.
> >   Yes I sure would!
>
> But you'd be wrong.  People don't like being insulted.
> And it distracts the GA from getting any work done.
>
> Which is one reason we don't achieve anything.
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>