Re: [ga-rules] A Fairer Set of Rules, Anyone?

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

good now we have progress.

And Patrick you are correct those are only one rule.  Remember how that guy
Jesus reduced ten lifetimes into only one rule. Look by the rules as they exist
we cannot get rid of the worst offender.  But if we live by a golden rule we can
nullify his impact which we have been doing.  I know it sounds weird but it
works, just look at me.  A model citizen reformed by good works of others. ;>}.
Let us give lack of censorship a chance.

Sincerely,
Eric
ps by tommorrow I will have good rules following these lines, that is if we do
not boycott.

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Hi Jeff
>
> > Rule #1.  There are no list rules, their are guidelines.
> > Rule #2 Banning from the list is prohibited unless it is SPAM.
> > Rule #3.  All guidelines are no mandatory but are highly recommended.
> > Rule #4. Filtering will not be done by the list admin. but is a suggested
> >               approach to those that wish not to read some list
> subscribers
> >                posts.
>
> That's not four rules but one only.
>
> If Rule #1 applies (no rules) then there can't be any banning under Rule #2.
> Rule #3 says the same thing as Rule #1 but in different words.
> And your last rule, Rule #4 is a consequence of Rule #1 (no rules).
>
> So you rules boil down to no rules.  All in favour of no rules say "Aye".
>
> > > Meanwhile the remaining List Monitors will enforce what we have.
> > > To the best of their ability.
> >
> >   Ok as long as you understand that that at best is arbitrary and
> > illegitimate...
>
> Says who?
>
> > > Meanwhile, I suggest that with three monitors we go for a majority vote.
> > > Two out of three gets a person suspended.  Comments anyone?
> >
> > Nope. If there are only three it should be unanimous or the list
> > participants to be fair.  Or the list participants must vote to determine
> > by majority vote on any action taken.
>
> Why should THREE people be fair and TWO people not fair?  That means that
> FOUR people will be fairer.  And FIVE fairer still.  Why not everybody on
> the GA?
>
> That's the fairest solution of them all.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html