[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

To: "!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>
Subject: Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 07:54:37 +0100
Cc: ga@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0002151949360.30387-100000@proxy.pccf.net>
References: <6b.1a9fa74.25db3c5f@aol.com>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

At 19:51 15.02.00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>Well - there seems to be alot of squalor in all this.  Not only is the
>issue of impersonation a reality here, a reality Harald seems to fight
>every day and issue directives on - yet - it's an issue for april.

Name a single issue of suspected impersonation occuring since the rules 
were instituted that has not been addressed by now.

                     Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

References:
- Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
  - From: "!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>

Prev by Date: Re: SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP AGAIN on DNSO GARe: [ga] GA Rules don't gofar enough
Next by Date: Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
Prev by thread: Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
Next by thread: Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread