Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Roberto,
you asked the straw poll to be documented so you might
pile up the reasons. May be some kind of a short draft would
be of interest now. I list myself:

-  statu quo for org registrants and
-  no business take away
-  Registrar/Registry split for gTLDs
-  M$ 5 to non-iCANN managed non profit organization
-  M$ 200 endowment to be managed on public decisions
    according to the iCANN principles: to support competition,
    equal treatment to all

Do I miss one of the key issues?
Jefsey

PS. I am creating the ORGANIC association under the
       French non-profit law (100 years stability this year).
       Its purpose is to manage the ".org" registry in
       compliance with the iCANN and Internet community
       requirements and to participate to a competitive bid.
       I have the support of several organizations against the
       Digital Divide and the support to Developping Countries;
      SME and @large organizations.

       Please who ever is interested let me know. I am
       just assuming Secretariat. Articles, ByLaws, Chair,
       ExecCom etc... will obviously be voted by participants.

      (ORGANIC stands for .org associative network
       information center).


On 09:08 19/03/01, Roberto Gaetano said:
>Kent,
>
>Just a couple of short comments, because I think that we made our 
>positions clear.
>
>>
>>Could be, I don't recall from the context above.  However, when you
>>think about it, what people are clamoring for is indeed that Verisign
>>determine the future of .org, because what they are clamoring for is
>>for .org to remain in vsgns hands.
>
>What they are clamoring is that it is better (or at least a lesser evil) 
>that .org stays with NSI than the Registrar stays with the Registry.
>And I agree with this approach.
>
>
>>
>>I think Mr Sclavos dictated that letter to a secretary mainly as a
>>polite message to the chair of the board of a company with whom his
>>company has been dealing with.  The letter is not a contract, and indeed
>>it is quite possible that Mr Sclavos dictated it in a hurry.
>
>Oh, yes! And we may even think that "it is quite possible" that the 
>secretary him/herself drafted the letter and put it in the pile of 
>documents to be signed (in a hurry). It's just about the monopoly in the 
>domain name business, worthed only few billion dollars, and it's perfectly 
>reasonable that it does not deserve more than few seconds of Mr. Sclavos' time.
>
>(Seriously, I thought you made above the assumption that Mr. Sclavos was 
>not an idiot! This seems to contradict your assumption.)
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html