<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions
Kent,
Just a couple of short comments, because I think that we made our positions
clear.
>
>Could be, I don't recall from the context above. However, when you
>think about it, what people are clamoring for is indeed that Verisign
>determine the future of .org, because what they are clamoring for is
>for .org to remain in vsgns hands.
What they are clamoring is that it is better (or at least a lesser evil)
that .org stays with NSI than the Registrar stays with the Registry.
And I agree with this approach.
>
>I think Mr Sclavos dictated that letter to a secretary mainly as a
>polite message to the chair of the board of a company with whom his
>company has been dealing with. The letter is not a contract, and indeed
>it is quite possible that Mr Sclavos dictated it in a hurry.
Oh, yes! And we may even think that "it is quite possible" that the
secretary him/herself drafted the letter and put it in the pile of documents
to be signed (in a hurry). It's just about the monopoly in the domain name
business, worthed only few billion dollars, and it's perfectly reasonable
that it does not deserve more than few seconds of Mr. Sclavos' time.
(Seriously, I thought you made above the assumption that Mr. Sclavos was not
an idiot! This seems to contradict your assumption.)
Regards
Roberto
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|