Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 07:09:43PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-03-19 09:08:38 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
> 
> Since there are parts of - at least - the dot-org agreement which
> are quite ambiguous (just consider that $5,000,000.- clause), this
> letter _may_ become important in the future.

1) The legal language in the contracts is far more precise than the
letter.  In particular, I believe that the clause concerning the
$5,000,000 is in fact quite clear, and not ambiguous at all.  

2) The *only* statement in the letter that has raised any question, to
my recollection, is the statement about appreciation of Vint's personal
committement to support a contract extension, if necessary.  This has
absolutely nothing to do with the terms of the contract, and has zero
information about the meaning of the terms of the contract.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html