<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] ICP-4
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga] ICP-4
- From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 17:26:37 +0200
- Cc: vcerf@mci.net, apisan@servidor.unam.mx, Amadeu@nominalia.com, karl@CaveBear.com, lyman@nexthop.com, jcohen@shapirocohen.com, phil.davidson@bt.com, f.fitzsimmons@att.net, ken.fockler@sympatico.ca, mkatoh@mkatoh.net, hans@icann.org, shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr, lynn@icann.org, andy@ccc.de, junsec@wide.ad.jp, quaynor@ghana.com, helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de, linda@icann.org, philip.sheppard@aim.be, gcarey@carey.cl, aaus@MPAA.org, cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com, Paul.Kane@reacto.com, erica.roberts@bigpond.com, kstubbs@dninet.net, vany@sdnp.org.pa, yjpark@myepark.com, mueller@syracuse.edu, greg_ruth@yahoo.com, tony.ar.holmes@bt.com, harris@cabase.org.ar, ck@nrm.se, Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz, rcochetti@verisign.com, grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz, mcade@att.com, orobles@nic.mx, Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr, pdeblanc@usvi.net
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I do disagree with Stuart's approach of the next MdR meeting (I accept that
there are certainly pressures). My main reason why is the poor security
image it gives of the Internet, adding to the weakness ICANN represents as
being unique in a totally distributed system.
Now things are committed, I would like to propose a positive way out
everyone could agree upon.
Instead of an "Internet Security Instant Manager training", it would be to
commonly prepare the ICP-4 "Internet Security" document through the launch
of a clean shirt review everyone could share, including the public through
a call to the press (so they would help rather than harass us).
1. the coming days could be dedicated to gather themes for a framework. I
initiated a WG Security to present a BC document and started gathering
points at icann-sme: I will publish these inputs to help GA commenting and
adding to it, so it becomes a common effort that Staff could use.
2. the target would be that in coming to MdR everyone could have some
elements to share from his own sector. Not to be educated about something
very simple but highly distributed no one other than us knows, but to share
our know-how and suggestions in shaping the ICP-4 frame.
3. I am sure this approach will lead to a reconsideration of the ICANN
structure. Security is an highly professional issue. The ICANN illness IMHO
is amateurism. A common effort clearly focused towards a professional issue
may only help us clarifying and probably speeding up the other pending issues.
My 3 euro cents.
Jefsey
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|