Re: [ga] ICP-4

[Chun Eung Hwi <ehchun@peacenet.or.kr>]

Dear Jefsey Morfin,

ICP-2 was initially drafted from ASO.
Now, what draft document on this topic is coming up from PSO?
Or do they have any WG on this topic?
Why DNSO should first take initiative for this job?
Could you explain it?


Regards,

Chun Eung Hwi
------------------------------------------------------------
Chun Eung Hwi
General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 583-3033
Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667 
Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun@peacenet.or.kr   
------------------------------------------------------------


On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> Ladies and Gentlemen,
> I do disagree with Stuart's approach of the next MdR meeting (I accept that 
> there are certainly pressures). My main reason why is the poor security 
> image it gives of the Internet, adding to the weakness ICANN represents as 
> being unique in a totally distributed system.
> 
> Now things are committed, I would like to propose a positive way out 
> everyone could agree upon.
> 
> Instead of an "Internet Security Instant Manager training", it would be to 
> commonly prepare the ICP-4 "Internet Security" document through the launch 
> of a clean shirt review everyone could share, including the public through 
> a call to the press (so they would help rather than harass us).
> 
> 1. the coming days could be dedicated to gather themes for a framework. I 
> initiated a WG Security to present a BC document and started gathering 
> points at icann-sme: I will publish these inputs to help GA commenting and 
> adding to it, so it becomes a common effort that Staff could use.
> 
> 2. the target would be that in coming to MdR everyone could have some 
> elements to share from his  own sector. Not to be educated about something 
> very simple but highly distributed no one other than us knows, but to share 
> our know-how and suggestions in shaping the ICP-4 frame.
> 
> 3. I am sure this approach will lead to a reconsideration of the ICANN 
> structure. Security is an highly professional issue. The ICANN illness IMHO 
> is amateurism. A common effort clearly focused towards a professional issue 
> may only help us clarifying and probably speeding up the other pending issues.
> 
> My 3 euro cents.
> Jefsey
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html