RE: [ga] Substance over rhetoric - a constructive challenge

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

On 18:22 16/03/02 -0500, Esther Dyson said:
>My pledge is (was) indeed intended towards something that I think has a 
>chance of working (such as this proposal). And  I would indeed welcome its 
>consideration by the 550 signed-up members of the New At-Large and anyone 
>else willing to discuss it ...and ideally, I hope that a critical mass 
>will also support it with funding.

The best way to proceed would be to ask all 573 signups of "the New ICANN 
at large" to vote as soon as there is a proposal to vote on.

If Alexander, fortified with your donation and Denise's co-operation, 
creates a separate At Large from the ALSC's database, then all individuals 
will simply have to choose which one they want to join and which one they 
trust to give them the best representational framework.

If Alexander wants to integrate your/his work with what has been done 
already, he will have to have his plans approved by  vote of the 573 
individuals.

We have to wait for Alexander to formulate his position in the light of 
your offer to him and the withdrawal of your pledge to icannatlage.com.

Then the vote can proceed.
A commercially run vote by a neutral outsider would be best.

--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html