Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 11:27 AM +0200 10/18/02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:59:22PM -0500,
> Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz> wrote
> a message of 23 lines which said:
>
>> The one thing we DO NOT want to replace ICANN with is the ITU. God help us.
>
>I could certainly agree (replacing a US-only bureaucracy by an
>international monster which tried very hard to crush the Internet is a
>progress?) but you did not explain *why*.

I thought everyone knew already! :^)

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html