Re: [ga] WHOIS data on .org domains

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

>Andy,
>I wonder how you "know" that these spammers are using .org names --- since
>most spammers work pretty hard to mask their real email addresses (and, in
>fact, their real IP addresses also).
>
>If you know based on the "from" address, then you should also know that this
>is one of the most easily spoofed parts of any email.

I'm talking about the WEBSITE they point to in the spam, not any spoofed
headers.

>-ram
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Andy Gardner" <andy@navigator.co.nz>
>To: <ga@dnso.org>
>Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:08 PM
>Subject: Re: [ga] WHOIS data on .org domains
>
>
>>
>> I note that many spammers are using .org names at present, as the WHOIS
>> screw-up makes it harder for Joe Average to track them down.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew P. Gardner
>> barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
>> We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
>> Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>
>>

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html