[ga] ALAC Chairs resignation

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

Intersting, because it shows the way ICANNers wants to rule us.
Whithout interest oterwise.

At 17:43 17/03/03, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>False. I gave the password to the watchdogs. And I am not Chair of 
>anything any more.

King Joop, you may now be a candidate as an ALAC Chair.

>You fail to mention that the three not resigning Panelists, including you,
>voted unanimously to have new elections rather than call replacements in and
>continue working. I simply applied what we decided. You could have voted
>against the election if you didn't want the Panel to stop working.

We never vote anything like that. You made us to waste 10 days voting on 
what we all asked for weeks, elections in good order, respecting the rules 
and the legitimacy.

>This was my decision (given the complete lack of rules about what to do in
>this case) to ensure the exact opposite - that elections would actually
>happen, and that the rest of the Panel would not be able to cancel them.

Let enjoy this.

When I say that ICANNers say YES for NO. We voted for election and
you committed to give the Panel the Members list so we could organize
them. Then you "ensured he exact opposite" in giving the list to people
unable/unwilling to organize election.

>If there are practical problems that prevent the election from happening, I
>have said a number of times that I am available to help the watchdogs.

Their fuits judge the trees. Where are the elections results?

>Jefsey, I might say the same about you and all your dramatic postings, with
>which apparently you are trying to put pressure on me so that I give the
>list to you and you can actually put your hands on the organization.

When I say that ICANNers ... :-)

I committed to serve that organization through its election because
it is my duty to do it. To make sure that I could never "put my hands"
I published I would not be a candidate.

I am just a democrat. Not an ICANNer....

>Why can't we simply have elections and let the members vote
>on who should lead them, rather than you and Bruce ruling the
>organization alone?

When I say that ICANNers say YES for NO ....:-)

Bruce and me got a duty in being elected. We try to protect an
action which actually is very similar to the GAn from you. .

But as soon as these elections are over, believe me I will
not do anything there. Ruling ??? Bruce and me ????
Childish.

But may be another one will return you your help:
http://www.icannatlarge.com/voting.htm

>There's no necessity for you to have the
>membership list before the elections.

Better to have the voters list before to run an election.
But you did not want that election.

What for now you resigned every Chair you had?
BTW a right move: putting your hands on the ALAC
was not your style.

jfc

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html