ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-intake]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-intake] Stockholm


Hi Phillip and all:

On Tue, 22 May 2001, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> NC Intake,
> On the agenda ideas for Stockholm, the NC agreed to talk only issues not
> procedures at this public meeting so budget matters remain off the agenda.
This was decided on May 29..right?
So this means that no reports neither from Budget Commitee neither form
Search Commitee...right?

> Tucows are asking every constituency for a slot on their agenda I think this
> will be enough exposure for a commercial entity and as proposed anything
> relevant can be part of the WHOIs report.
I am agree.

> New constituency creation is a part of the DNSO business plan and is already
> on the agenda.
Excellent!!!

> WIPO 3 is at an interim discussion stage and is inviting public comments. A
> presentation on possible outcomes will not be useful. There are a lot of
> issues to be discussed and resolved by WIPO before they can come up with a
> proposal for PRACTICAL changes to the UDRP.
But it is good to know anyway what's going on.  However, I must tell you
that my proposal of having Kathy Kleinman speaking about WIPO-3 was a
misundersting of my part.  She asked me to talk about it in the NCDNHC
meeting, not in the NC meeting.  But the confussion was cleared.  However,
if you this group change of opinion, still she is open to update the NC on
WIPO-3 subject.

> But I have now added GA chair, dot biz, dot info have confirmed, ICANN staff
> with talk about multi-lingual outreach and I have added dot org. That lot
> should keep us going. I'll post a tidied up agenda soon
Who do you have in mind to speak about .ORG divestment?  Please, let me
know.

Cheers
Vany
:-)



-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax: (507) 230-3455
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>