Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

If you will recall, the registrars had agreed to a best practices statement,
which addresses this issue, among others.  It would help further concensus
building to consider that draft for a starting position.  Please let me know
if you need a copy. Thanks, Elana

----- Original Message -----
From: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
To: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>; Robert F. Connelly
<rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign


> Hi,
> I'm happy to progress this further - and maybe get it included in the NC
> business plan.
> Amadeau - Do you still have the text you drafted when you were a member of
> the NC?
>
> erica
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
> To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
>
>
> > "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > >
> > > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> > >
> >
> > Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> > concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing language provided
> > for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then "sent" to the
> > Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
> >
> > Hope something could be done here ;-))
> >
> > Amadeu
>
>