Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

I underrstand that the process for getting a 'best practices' document
enshrined in ICANN 'policy' would be roughly as follows:

1.  Registrars constituency forwards the proposed policy to the NC for
endorsement.
2.  NC posts the proposed policy for public comment and specifically seeks a
response from each of the DNSO constituencies.
3.  Comment incorporated into new draft developed by Registrars in liaison
with NC.
4.  New draft published for comment.
5.  NC votes on new draft and, if agreed, advises the Board.
6.  The BoD considers and votes on the NC advice.

If this is to be incorporated into ICANN policy, there is a lengthy process
to be followed and we need to get to Stage 1 asap.

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>
To: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; "Amadeu Abril i Abril"
<Amadeu@nominalia.com>; "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign


> If you will recall, the registrars had agreed to a best practices
statement,
> which addresses this issue, among others.  It would help further concensus
> building to consider that draft for a starting position.  Please let me
know
> if you need a copy. Thanks, Elana
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> To: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>; Robert F. Connelly
> <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm happy to progress this further - and maybe get it included in the NC
> > business plan.
> > Amadeau - Do you still have the text you drafted when you were a member
of
> > the NC?
> >
> > erica
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
> > To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
Verisign
> >
> >
> > > "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> > > concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing language provided
> > > for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then "sent" to the
> > > Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
> > >
> > > Hope something could be done here ;-))
> > >
> > > Amadeu
> >
> >
>
>