Re: [registrars] Re: Ballot should be secret until the end of the voting period.

[Thomas Keller <tom@schlund.de>]

This sounds reasonable and I would like to support this approach
as well. Secondly I would like to support Ross's idea about
incorparating this new rule into the upcoming set of the RC's
"new voting rules".

Best

tom

Am 16.03.2003 schrieb Paul Westley:
> This seems like a very sensible approach.
> 
> Paul Westley
> Internetters
> 
> At 17:04 16/03/03, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> >It seems silly to spend the time to go through a vote on this. Everyone
> >who has chimed in has supported the idea that results should be kept
> >secret during the vote, as do I. I suggest that Rick just do it. We had
> >other votes done that way. Then if anyone apposes the idea let them make
> >a motion to change it and see if anyone seconds it.
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On
> >Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
> >Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:11 AM
> >To: Registrar Constituency
> >Subject: Re: [registrars] Re: Ballot should be secret until the end of
> >the voting period.
> >
> >At 10:20 AM 3/16/03 -0500, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >>Rather than going through a full vote of this, I'd like to propose that
> >we
> >>simply include this practice in the Voting Rules of Procedure that
> >comes out
> >>of the by-laws reform that we are currently working on.
> >
> >Dear Ross:  I believe the amended motion should be passed upon now.
> >We'll
> >have plenty of votes between now and when the by-laws are
> >finalized;-(  Remember the Transfer TF history::-((
> >
> >Regards, BobC
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--
> >"I've sawed this board off three times, and it's *still* too short".
> >
> >"Small choice between rotten apples."  Dr. U.B. Bray
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w