<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Re: Ballot should be secret until the end of the voting period.
This seems like a very sensible approach.
Paul Westley
Internetters
At 17:04 16/03/03, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>It seems silly to spend the time to go through a vote on this. Everyone
>who has chimed in has supported the idea that results should be kept
>secret during the vote, as do I. I suggest that Rick just do it. We had
>other votes done that way. Then if anyone apposes the idea let them make
>a motion to change it and see if anyone seconds it.
>
>Tim
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On
>Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
>Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:11 AM
>To: Registrar Constituency
>Subject: Re: [registrars] Re: Ballot should be secret until the end of
>the voting period.
>
>At 10:20 AM 3/16/03 -0500, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >Rather than going through a full vote of this, I'd like to propose that
>we
> >simply include this practice in the Voting Rules of Procedure that
>comes out
> >of the by-laws reform that we are currently working on.
>
>Dear Ross: I believe the amended motion should be passed upon now.
>We'll
>have plenty of votes between now and when the by-laws are
>finalized;-( Remember the Transfer TF history::-((
>
>Regards, BobC
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>"I've sawed this board off three times, and it's *still* too short".
>
>"Small choice between rotten apples." Dr. U.B. Bray
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|