Re: [IFWP] Re: [dnso.discuss] Modifications to ICIIU Guidelines and NCDNHC definition

[william@dso.net (William X. Walsh)]

On Mon, 31 May 1999 04:28:02 +0100, Jeff Williams
<jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>William and all,
>
>  You know very well of our existence as it has been publicized on
>several occasions.  But for your memory refreshment:
>http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/proposals/ineginc/ineginc.htm
>

NTIA posted comments from many people, and their posting of comments
was done without investigation of the bodies submitting comments, as
you well know.

So their posting of comments from a fraudulent organization is no
proof at all.

Shall we discuss the reporters who retracted portions of stories where
they quoted you when they realized how badly they had been duped by
your little game you are playing here?

In any event, you are not a member of the ICIIU, for according to
Michael's own rules, you are not eligible, and to be eligible you
would have to present your bona fides.  Oh how I would love to see you
try and do that....................

Especially when you can't even produce a corporation number in
Delaware, and attorneys who have done searches have failed to find any
corporation by that name incorporated in Delaware.  You know, you
really should of picked Nevada for the state you chose to claim
incorporation in, for at least you could of used their privacy
policies as a justification for the lack of results from searches.

But that was just ignorange on your part.



--
William X. Walsh william@dso.net
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Fax:(209) 671-7934

The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go 
crying to every time you have something 
to whimper about.