[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
From: Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:46:26 -0300 (GMT+3)
In-Reply-To: <19991218034422.A2796@aptld.org>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


My vote - Abstain.

I'd like to create more gTLDs but I think that it is impossible to take a
decision about quantity of new gTLDs if at the same time we don't discuss
the characteristics of the new registries, how we'll decide which gTLDs
we'll create and who will have the initiative (icann or the market). 

The point 3 in the original mail from Jon is not a issue to deal with it 
later.

Raul Echeberria
raul@inia.org.uy

References:
- Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
  - From: Younjung Park <yjpark@aptld.org>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] To the Abstainers
Next by Date: [wg-c] Consensus Vote - yes
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
Next by thread: AW: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread