RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p

["Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

No it does not. Becasue it ignores too many things.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> William X. Walsh
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 1:06 PM
> To: Roeland M. J. Meyer
> Cc: Dave Crocker; wg-c@dnso.org; Paul Garrin
> Subject: RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman
> "p
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 14-Mar-2000 Roeland M. J. Meyer wrote:
> >> Name.space and any of the operators of alternative TLDs have 
> >> no right to expect
> >> introduction or prior use rights here.  None.
> > 
> > 
> > Would you care to back that assertion with a bit of logic?
> 
> As I said, Roeland, those operators knew they were operating 
> outside of the
> system, and had no reasonable belief that they would gain any 
> standing or be
> added to the roots.  They were aware of their lack of 
> sanction, and proceeded
> to operate anyway.
> 
> Their knowledge they were operating outside of the system is 
> sufficient logic,
> Roeland. 
> 
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> http://userfriendly.com/
> Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
> GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
> Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/
> 
> iD8DBQE4zqmz8zLmV94Pz+IRAtpSAJ9pOg8VKq5ETmYB6z6bwuV7x85ePQCgoLbW
> BpPqbGgdokOFl6HN7EA2UlA=
> =Mxv3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>