[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p

To: "Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Paul Garrin <pg@name-space.com>, wg-c@dnso.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
In-Reply-To: <007201bf8e97$27679950$eaaf6cc7@PEREGRIN>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 15-Mar-2000 Roeland M. J. Meyer wrote:
> No it does not. Becasue it ignores too many things.

May I ask you to be more specific as to what it ignores?

Am I not correct that they started their operations with that knowledge? 

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4z++Z8zLmV94Pz+IRAqLFAJ42pmZ/oqKz02G9pKeslZAI7xZORACfYkkW
vzoAuspw6sg0DSk0VekDbsc=
=GCcO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p
  - From: "Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] INT domain
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] INT domain
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "principles")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread