[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements

To: jelliott@tucows.com
Subject: RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:42:27 -0800
Cc: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>, Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJLLPOMBEMOIDNIJHCEEICCAA.jelliott@tucows.com>
References: <XFMail.20000316215901.william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 05:54 AM 3/17/00 -0800, Josh Elliott wrote:
>I do think, however, it is reasonable to assume there could be other
>competitive models other than a registry/registrar model.

What examples do you have in mind?

d/

=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
  - From: Josh Elliott <jelliott@tucows.com>

References:
- RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
- RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
  - From: Josh Elliott <jelliott@tucows.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] WG Report: deadlines and draft language
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread