RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements

[Josh Elliott <jelliott@tucows.com>]

I don't think it is realistic to think that ICANN will approve new
monopolies in the DNS.  While we haven't necessarily come to consensus on
this point, it does not makes sense to argue such an issue.  Do people
really think that if we come to consensus that there could be new
monopolies, ICANN and DOC would consider it?

I do think, however, it is reasonable to assume there could be other
competitive models other than a registry/registrar model.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> William X. Walsh
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 9:59 PM
> To: Rick H Wesson
> Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 17-Mar-2000 Rick H Wesson wrote:
> >   o operational issues - what reports and are generated for registrars,
>
> This implies that all registries would be shared.  I know of no
> consensus on
> this point.
>
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> http://userfriendly.com/
> Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
> GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
> Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/
>
> iD8DBQE40cml8zLmV94Pz+IRAg3OAJ9KnNoarvJEI8/xYJHeWQEhuskKiwCgkf+6
> 5PUxPmsDzIJPvpBzNTzBlng=
> =bEcw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----