[wg-c] further exclusions/surity insterments

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

how do folks feel about the preformance bond that NSI Registry requires
for a Surity insterment. IMHO if there are 6 to 10 new gTLDs and just for
argument each gTLD is allocated to a new registry and each registry
required a simular surity interment. current ICANN accredited registrars
would need $600,000 to $1,000,000 in either cash or Fedility insurance to
participate with all the new registries.

should there be any requirements on new registries to ensure that a surity
inseterement is *not* required. seems hard to specificly lower the barrier
to entry in such a way. It also is very hard for me to see that all active
registrys would want to tie up to a million in cash or other assets to
participate.

how should this issue be addressed?

-rick