[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements

To: Josh Elliott <jelliott@tucows.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJLLPOMBEMOIDNIJHCEEICCAA.jelliott@tucows.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 17-Mar-2000 Josh Elliott wrote:
> I don't think it is realistic to think that ICANN will approve new
> monopolies in the DNS.

Sorry, but this premise that a new non-shared registry is a monopoly is flawed.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE40o3X8zLmV94Pz+IRAn3GAJ91IOE8gr0tKvTFz0NMsgtAkH/iJACaA1v2
Ld6i9kJhwFb8o0rL9JneL8E=
=6N6/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
  - From: Josh Elliott <jelliott@tucows.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Exclusions
Next by Date: [wg-c] Wesson draft - (gTLD Application Requirements)
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread