[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs

To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 15:00:54 -0800
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20000319143914.william@userfriendly.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003191702530.17613-100000@xfiles2.idirect.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 02:39 PM 3/19/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Full and proper market competition would include competition at the registry
>level also, would it not?

Please specify exactly what you mean by "competition at the registry level" 
and how pursuit of it does not run afoul of technical constraints, such as 
those described by the Internet Architecture Board.

d/

=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
- RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
  - From: "Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread