[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
To
:
wg-c@dnso.org
Subject
: Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
From
: "Mark C. Langston" <
mark@bitshift.org
>
Date
: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 15:16:45 -0800
In-Reply-To
: <
3.0.3.32.20000319002024.02fbeee4@msen.com
>; from weinberg@mail.msen.com on Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 12:20:24AM -0500
References
: <3.0.3.32.20000316151808.02fda92c@msen.com> <3.0.6.32.20000316124651.00818100@imt.net> <
3.0.3.32.20000316010430.0070d1f4@msen.com
> <3.0.6.32.20000318141739.0082e100@imt.net> <
3.0.3.32.20000319002024.02fbeee4@msen.com
>
Sender
:
owner-wg-c@dnso.org
I vote: Yes. -- Mark C. Langston mark@bitshift.org Systems & Network Admin San Jose, CA
References
:
[wg-c] WG Report: deadlines and draft language
From:
Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
[wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
From:
Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
[wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
From:
Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Next by Date:
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Prev by thread:
Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
Next by thread:
Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
Index(es):
Date
Thread