[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs

To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <20000320142203.G24427@songbird.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Mar-2000 Kent Crispin wrote:
> we don't
> want to only have TLDs that have potential registrations in the
> multimillions -- that would just create repeats of the .com problem. 

What exactly is the ".com problem" Kent?

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE41q0I8zLmV94Pz+IRAikPAKDrY3W7m8uePpsdkAIasDExYZQ2TgCePfyC
7Z27XL11h03l/UBkdNoye50=
=AM0Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Vote
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread