Re: [wg-c] list rules

["Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>]

It's a little too little and a little too late.

There are those of us who react to the kind of mass postings of yesterday by selecting the whole mass and recycling it.  It might have been different had I been at the console and seen the messages as they came in, but sme of us were at the Small Business Administration's roundtable on Famous Mark Protection, and therefore were in no position to see the flood.

>>> Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com> 04/11/00 10:54AM >>>
	Four people managed to post 54 messages yesterday.  This is a profound
inconvenience for the rest of us, who are trying to get some work done.
Once more, a reminder:  Ground rules for the working group include basic
courtesy and respect for others, and a limit of any subscriber's postings
to *two per day.*  Persistent violators (you know who you are) will be
sanctioned.

Jon

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential
and is or may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work
product doctrine, joint defense privileges, trade secret protections,
and/or other applicable protections from disclosure.  If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this com-
munication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communi-
cation in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk
at 212-541-2000 ext.3314, or by e-mail to helpdesk@rspab.com
**********************************************************************