[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] list rules

To: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] list rules
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000411150651.00b625b0@postoffice.att.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 11-Apr-2000 Simon Higgs wrote:
> I would also like to request the chair's assistance in maintaining some 
> degree of honesty and truth about the real world facts being posted here, 
> that are affecting the work being done. There are a number of untruths 
> being spread to justify positions in the test registry. The ICANN process 
> cannot be based upon lies. If not addressed here, these issues will end up 
> being resolved outside this working group in the courts (one conflict 
> already is in court with the judge refusing to dismiss the case), much to 
> the detriment of ICANN's public image and real world credibility.

I find this post insulting, Simon, and a blatent attempt at manipulation.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE486vQ8zLmV94Pz+IRAosgAKDtsq6ojNm1OW0KgW+jECsmkFr+vQCg9vYh
YzOii47LOsCJMp6l4bXfTco=
=Z/aH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] list rules
  - From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] list rules
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] list rules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread