[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

To: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>, wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <003b01bfa4e1$cbf940d0$4a0e379d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 13-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> I'm sure the majority of people reading this list (and not posting) aren't
> fooled by the FUD and rhetoric coming out of you, William.

No Chris, I'm sure that the majority are not fooled by yours and Simon's
attempts to twist history and facts to bolster claims to TLDs that you self
claimed, and have no right to, and have no right to expect any advanced
standing to.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE49QuW8zLmV94Pz+IRAjGYAJ49lIng1hR21tbst2Gk/9bLvKQFRgCgirAM
fclog02NUsC9ws87LZXWqNs=
=p+ZK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread