Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>]

At 04:49 PM 4/12/00 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:

>On 13-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> > I'm sure the majority of people reading this list (and not posting) aren't
> > fooled by the FUD and rhetoric coming out of you, William.
>
>No Chris, I'm sure that the majority are not fooled by yours and Simon's
>attempts to twist history and facts to bolster claims to TLDs that you self
>claimed, and have no right to, and have no right to expect any advanced
>standing to.

Who is claiming anything? There's a list of legally binding TLD 
applications filed, per RFC1591, sitting in a file in IANA/ICANN. The NSF 
has made it clear that only TLDs filed in way will be considered:

http://name.space.xs2.net/law/answers/letters/NSF-NSI08111997.jpg
"The Foundation [NSF] and NSI agreed that new TLDs would be added only in 
accordance with Request For Comments 1591."

What part of this don't you understand? Are you still a sore loser because 
you can't have your own ccTLD?