[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
At 09:01 PM 4/12/00 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
We know what the NSF position is on RFC1591 submissions. Exactly what is
the WG-C policy on RFC1591 submissions? Maybe that info will solve the problem.
> Um . . . folks . . . speaking as the WG co-chair, I think that we've
>beaten the "what happened in 1995" topic to death. If you must continue
>this argument, please do it off-list.
>
>Jon
>
>At 05:10 PM 4/12/00 -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote:
> >> Those are really "Jon Postel" submissions (which even he later
> >disclaimed), and
> >> have no relevance to this process or to ICANN, thank you.
> >
> >Sorry, I have to call you on this one. Please present documentation of Jon
> >Postel "disclaiming" the list which he posted, or retract.
> >
> >Thanks much,
> >
> >Christopher