[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Consensus call

To: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Consensus call
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000413101348.00b22e30@postoffice.att.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 13-Apr-2000 Simon Higgs wrote:
> At 08:32 AM 4/13/00 -0700, Josh Elliott wrote:
> 
> hostmaster@internic.net (InterNIC/NSI) has the RFC1591 records too.
> 
> These are also under Federal contract. "Lost" is not an option.


Wrong.

The only valid requests under RFC1591 were for ccTLDs.    There was no federal
contract for new gTLDs.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE49ghr8zLmV94Pz+IRAjQOAJ9OlVbWYfv06dwqSfXzCtQOTPxJZgCcDgNz
WaWGF+ezbwnvjA/hca5VCPI=
=YnhA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

References:
- RE: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] wg-c list management
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] Consensus call
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread