Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

I thought this topic was taboo here?

I'm not going to reply, but I'd request that the edict be applied to
EVERYONE.

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web
----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "Simon Higgs" <simon@higgs.net>
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Consensus call


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 13-Apr-2000 Simon Higgs wrote:
> > At 08:32 AM 4/13/00 -0700, Josh Elliott wrote:
> >
> > hostmaster@internic.net (InterNIC/NSI) has the RFC1591 records too.
> >
> > These are also under Federal contract. "Lost" is not an option.
>
>
> Wrong.
>
> The only valid requests under RFC1591 were for ccTLDs.    There was no
federal
> contract for new gTLDs.
>
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> http://userfriendly.com/
> GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
> Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/
>
> iD8DBQE49ghr8zLmV94Pz+IRAjQOAJ9OlVbWYfv06dwqSfXzCtQOTPxJZgCcDgNz
> WaWGF+ezbwnvjA/hca5VCPI=
> =YnhA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----