[wg-review] NO more Discussion on Time's up for ICANN in this group.

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Hello Len and others,

Admitting the issue you raised can be debated in "Internet Governance"
in a metaphysical or philosophical manner rather than realistic approach,
I want to suggest this group focus on more positive approach to better
dnso/icann.

According to the discussion some of you have had, there appears that
we have agreed upon this.

Thanks,
YJ

Bruce wrote:
> I agree, to take this topic off this WG list. we have more than we can
> handle now. I hereby make a motion to take this topic off this WG agenda.
> May I have a Second?

Kent wrote:

> It is not a matter for motions and seconds.  It is obviously an
> out-of-order discussion, the chair should so designate it.

Sotiropoulos wrote:

> If ICANN is not prepared to re-evaluate its current direction &
priorities,
> the dissolution is inevitable. [snip]
> Thus, I am all for looking into every option.

DPF wrote:

> This is outside the terms of reference of this working group.  If you
> feel a need to keep pushing this issue can you please do so in the GA
> where it is somewhat more on topic.

Len wrote:

> One issue that needs to be resolved is the likelihood that ICANN will
cease
> to exist or will be substantially broken up by March 2001.