ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests


Bruce James wrote:
> 
> I refer you to this link:
> 
> http://www.icann.org/at-large/at-large.htm

I find no reference at all to the DNSO at that page. Nor have I ever
heard a suggestion that the @large will participate in developing
domain name policy with the DNSO. I think you and Peter de Blanc are
a little confused. In point of fact, the @large membership has no
brief to initiate policy in ICANN, and will probably cease to exist
as soon as the Board's "At-large Review Committee" has finished its
machiavellian chores.

M.S.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>