Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests

[Bruce James <bmjames@swbell.net>]

A study is to be done on the @Large Directors of ICANN.

See:  http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#II

I hope the @Large Directors are expanded.  As far as the DNSO, I hope they
will participate in developing domain name policy with the DNSO.

Bruce




----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Sondow" <msondow@iciiu.org>
To: "DNSO Review List" <wg-review@dnso.org>
Cc: "Bruce James" <bmjames@swbell.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests


Bruce James wrote:
>
> I refer you to this link:
>
> http://www.icann.org/at-large/at-large.htm

I find no reference at all to the DNSO at that page. Nor have I ever
heard a suggestion that the @large will participate in developing
domain name policy with the DNSO. I think you and Peter de Blanc are
a little confused. In point of fact, the @large membership has no
brief to initiate policy in ICANN, and will probably cease to exist
as soon as the Board's "At-large Review Committee" has finished its
machiavellian chores.

M.S.