Re: Re: [wg-review] Proposal for ICANN Board electors and funding.

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

If you say so Ken. I believe it is relevant, but as I suggested early on, if
we could take them one at a time whether there be 12 or 13 issues and
confine questions to that topic I'd be happy to do so. I also suggested that
if we cannot address them all by Jan 15th that we define the problems to be
discussed in individual groups or future WGs within that time frame, then
have the topics back to review from each group to form one solid proposal.

I don't see one topic at a time being discussed. I see yet another list
being formed when there was already one made. I hear talk of no progress yet
a list of 13 items was presented here and all of my posts have been toward
those topics. Am I to understand now we are going to select a new group of
topics? If so, will this be the final group of topics or will we make a new
list next time someone wants to.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [wg-review] Proposal for ICANN Board electors and funding.


> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:37:27PM -0800, Chris McElroy wrote:
> > You are welcome to address me directly Ken. The post is relevant when
some
> > think Individuals should pay again for representation when they already
do
> > so. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are off
> > topic. And yes I do have a beef. A beef about people's rights getting
> > stepped on and this IS the place to do that.
>
> No, you are seriously mistaken.  This is a WG with a very constrained
> mission, and it is suffering from horrible mission creep at this point
> in time.  It has itself become an example of one of the primary problems
> it is supposed to address -- an unfocussed rambling bitch session.
>
> > If I was looking for just any
> > forum there are many to choose from.
> >
> > The UDRP has already been brought up and not by me,
>
> It was off-topic then, too.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html