Re: Re: [wg-review] Proposal for ICANN Board electors and funding.

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/3/01 5:20:11 AM, Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

>Dear Sotiris,
>if you permit me a comparison so you better understand what this WG-Review 
>is about. And what we want to do.
>Let assume you want to drive your familly to seashore.
<snip>
>Here we are with mechanics, the review of the engine and potentially the 
>buying of a new car fitting our needs (defining Working Group F). Some 
>topics like the size of your boad may be of inciodental interest when a new 
>car (WG and even a new DNSO), but not so many ...

What a colourful imagination you have Jefsey.  However, I am not sure your comparison is apt.  You see, if it were, you'd have to consider 1) whether all 
of your family is coming along, 2) what the seating arrangements will be, 3) how much baggage each member of the family will bring along, 4) whether it 
would be more advantageous to rent a van, & 5) if a plane ride were not a better option... etc.   After all, what if that seashore is 700 miles away?  

>We have a very small amount of time. We are concerned by very important 
>topics for the ICANN. One of these topics is to get rid of the @large 
>concerns which have to be better and correctly housed in the @large 
>organization to come.

I suppose those who wish to rid this list of the @large concerns will also be the ones who organize the @large "organization to come"?  hmm...  I suspect 
you're misunderstanding the following sentence from YJ's Overview: "The DNSO Review Working Group's objective is to evaluate
the performance of ICANN's DNSO and to propose structural and procedural changes that will help ICANN's Domain Name Supporting Organization fulfill 
its mission of becoming a bottom-up policy coordination body."  I suppose you think it will become a "bottom-up policy coordination body" all by itself?  In 
other words, it's really unecessary for you to take your family along to the seashore... in fact, it's unecessary that anyone goes along.  The car goes to the 
seashore by itself... without even you, Jefsey.  

>Here is what I propose you and the many @large people who came on this 
>list: it is to participate actively in this effort in starting the @large 
>list the ICANN has not created yet for us. I created it as 
>icann-atlarge@egroups.com. Just send a mail to 
>icann-atlarge-subscribe@egroups.com. And there let discuss all the topic we 
>want to rise and which do not belong to the DNSO.

I strenuously object.  The issues many of us have raised relate most assiduously to the DNSO.  

>One of the targets of the WG-Review is to remove the @large concerns from 
>the DNSO and to port them to the coming @large organization. If we want 
>both the DNSO and the @large to be efficient and working closely together 
>we have to accept that. So from the icann-atlarge@egroups.com list we will 
>be able to prepare adequate comments to this list.

No... actually, I'm sure that MANY see the @large concerns to be part of the DNSO's concerns.  After all, some of us fellow family members & travellers, 
perhaps even the wife, may not want to go to the seashore Jefsey.  Who are you to tell us we must?


Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc.


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html