<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Objectives of this WG
Hello Philip,
> I have just joined this WG and am concerned that, with a deadline of 15
> January, discussion is unfocused. To help please see below the Names
Council
> decision in the draft summary of the last meeting which established this
WG:
Welcome to Review WG as both member of this group and a strong candidate
for next NC Chair following Ken. I hope you can be a good liaison from NC
together with Peter, Ken and myself.
> "Decision D4:
> - establish a Review Working Group, chaired by Y.J. Park
> - make the "terms of reference" "responding to the Names Council Review
Task
> Force questionnaire"
> - make the lifetime of the WG January 15th
> - ask the group to report by January 15th to the NC Review Task Force.
> - issue a press release immediately to encourage participation in this WG.
"
>
> That is it. The terms of reference are very simple. Please could the group
> focus on providing a response to the questionnaire produced by the Names
> Council Review Task Force. There are12 days left to respond.
First, thank you for sharing this draft summary of meeting which has not
been
available in the council list, yet.
Second, according to my undertsanding on WG in DNSO since 1999 June,
the normal lifetime of each WG was more than six months and even WG-D
is not dissolved yet.
As member of Review-WG since you joined yesterday,
you have witnessed there have been enough reasons and demands
NC should extend the working days of Review WG.
Congratulating you on your nomination as NC Chair for the next six months,
I do strongly request you to reconsider this seriously.
Thanks,
YJ
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|