Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars

[ERIC@HI-TEK.COM]

It would seem that Ms. Park has something of real value to report:
There is no objection to the formation of a IDNH constituency.  Also that that
constituency should have representation on the BoD.  Also that a reliable method
must be formulated which will assure that the constituency be inclusive enough
to include holders, would be holders and basically anyone who is interested
enough to register.
Furthermore it must be decided how much representation is afforded this
constituency and if it should be viewed as an additional source of revenue.
Sincerely

DPF wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:15:10 -0500, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> >i will say it again... frankly, i feel that an individual constituancy is a
> >good idea and have expressed that opinion on numerous occasions. i only am
> >concerned that the constituancy is "inclusive enough" and have viewed over
> >the last 18 months a continual strife in the ga to accomplish this
> >"inclusiveness" goal. as you are aware.
>
> Ken - thanks for the above post which I found very useful.  One of the
> things I suggested early on was that we should try and obtain
> consensus firstly on whether the principle of an IDNH constituency is
> supported and then after that work on some guidelines for how it can
> be constructed so that it is inclusive, democratic, representative
> etc.
>
> So far I have not seen anyone at all state they are against the
> principle of an IDNH constituency and in fact many people now
> including yourself have said they are in favour.  Therefore are we as
> a Working Group in a position to state that (for as long as there is a
> constituency structure) we believe the DNSO will be enhanced by the
> addition of an IDNH constituency.  If no-one objects to this statement
> within 48 hours can we take it as accepted?
>
> This does not bind everyone into automatically supporting any
> particular application but it does then allow us to work
> constructively on the best way to move forward such a constituency
> rather than continue debates about whether individuals should have
> representation at all.
>
> DPF
> ________________________________________________________________________
> <david at farrar dot com>
> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html