ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] 7. [NAME COUNCIL] Secretary vs. secretariat


To all.
I though about Elisabeth Porteneuve's mail of yesterday. She says that now 
she is elected to the NC she has to give up being the Secretary of the 
DNSO. I also observe the support that my difficult understand of the 
WG-Review situation as far as NC is concerned. To help Elisabeth has kindly 
proposed several URL I declined as I feel incompetent to go through the NC 
Archive and decide what are the real decisions.

I therefore propose the following Motion;

"
The number and the complexity of the various printed and electronic 
documents the NC must produce and archive has been identified as one of the 
difficulty to relate and therefore to reach a consensus with the NC. The 
WG-Review therefore request that the NC elects a Permanent Secretary, as 
usually do the public bodies. His/Her task will include supervising the 
Scribe and the secretariat Staff on behalf of the NC. No NC report or 
decision will take effect without the co-signature of the Secretary. ICANN 
bylaws will be modified as appropriate to accommodate this motion.
"

Jefsey


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>