<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] 15. [DNDEF] Definition of the Domain Name, Report requested by Members
Dear Jefsey,
The topics or issues you have listed here are "absolutely" critical in DNSO.
however, the characteristics of these questions need long-term perspective
and diverse responses.
This can be divided into many working groups later, if the timing is ripe.
Thanks,
YJ
> Dear Chair,
> Several Members have voice here that one of the main problem for reaching
a
> consensus in a Consulting body to the BoD as the DNSO should be and will
> become once the @large constituency is eventually enacted is based upon a
> basic technical disagreement about the very technical, legal, commercial,
> etc... nature of the Domain Name.
>
> I therefore propose a new additional subject for this WG-Review subject
as:
>
> 15. [DNDEF] Definition of the Domain Name, Report requested by Members
>
> 1. I propose to maintain the site http://dndef.org to maintain a current
> status of the pending questions and achievements
>
> 2. I propose to start with the following general questions from Sotiris
and
> many other posts:
>
> - different type of domain names:
>
> - standard practice
> - multilingual domain names
> - access domain name
> - dynamic domain names
> - aliasing
>
> - semantics
>
> - TLD
> - saxon/latin semantics
> - ideograms
> - formatted domain names
> - rules of access
> - member names
> - search engines
>
> - legal aspects definition
>
> - name space
> - ULDs vs. TLDs
> - temporary TLDs
> - copy rights
> - private rights
> - freedom of speech
> - creativity
> - naming property
> - TM and logos, sounds
> - exiting addressing, classification etc.. schemes
> - leasing, holding, owning
> - existing rights
> - patentability
>
> - impact of the lack of definition of the domain names in documents
>
> - ordering a domain name
> - selling a domain name
> - UDRP
> - technical aspects of cybersquatting
> - consequence of current practices vs. legal accurate definition
>
>
> Jefsey Morfin
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|