Re: [wg-review] 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decisions preparation by consensus, Report requested by Members

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

> Greg's proposition concerning consensus study and practice widely accepted
> and discussed by this WG-Review, I propose a new subject as:

It appears that this group keens on this issue.

We can merge this issue with 5. [Working Groups] 7. [NC]
8. [WGs and NC] 3. [Constituencies] under one of assumptions
that there will be constituencies in the dnso 4. [GA] etc.

How WGs have achieved their consensus among members.
How Constituencies have achieved their consensus among members
How GA has achieved its consensus among members
How NC has achieved its consensus among members.

On the other hand, this can be one of fundamental questions we have
to cast to DNSO/ICANN as independent issue.

Let me suggest this.
Let us focus on the initial sub-issues for progress report as of Jan 15.
And then after Jan 15th, this can be added as another independent topic.

Thanks,
YJ

> 14. [BY CONSENSUS] decision preparation by consensus, Report requested by
> Members
>
> As for the other subjects:
>
> 1. I propose to open the site http://byconsensus.org to maintain a current
> status of the pending questions and achievements
> '
> 2. I propose to start with the following general questions from Greg and
> many other posts:
>
>      -  consensus vs voting
>      -  group and technical consensus definitions
>      -  guidelines towards a consensus
>      -  consensus tools
>      -  bad practices: a compendium of errors against consensus
>
> 3. I suggest that Greg Burton is proposed to use that frame to enter all
> the points he has proposed or received in response,so we may have a good
> basis for a Center of Interests work.
>
> 4. I repeat my motion which has now been seconded by several Members:
>
> "
> The WG-Review has observed that reaching a consensus within the DNSO was
> basically hampered by the lack of definition and therefore of common
> understanding of what a DNSO consensus is and how it is determined
> "
>
> The common target would to offer and maintain to the advantage of the
whole
> ICANN community a real experience and qualification about consensus
> building and achievement. So it will practical serve te DNSO, the NC and
> the ICANN.
>
> Jefsey
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html