RE: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 3:08 PM

> Fine.  So you bring a suit against the board for not following its 
> bylaws.  You get an injunction against the board not following the 
> bylaws.  The board amends the bylaws and proceeds with what it was 
> going to do.

Seeing this, as a representitive sample of attitude. I am aghast. If this is
really the way the ICANN BoD collectively feels, then there is no recourse
but to call for the dissolution of the ICANN, as a failed experiment gone
out of control.

I have reasons for NOT wanting to see that happen. However, an organization
that behaves so dishonorably, is not fit to continue its existance.
Furthermore, such core dishonesty is impossible to deal with. Two years ago,
ICANN asked us too trust it. While some of us had serious reservations,
enough of us went along with it that the rest had to follow. The process
described above is exactly the sort of thing folks were castigating NSI for,
three years ago.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html