Re: [wg-review] Nader Calls For World Consumer Protection Organizationin Internet

[Robin Miller <robin@minervan.com>]

I unfortunately, have to agree with both Eric and Phil... although I support
some Nader positions, he's also shown himself to be rather authoritarian and
undemocratic. Its his way or the highway, and that's no way for the Internet. 

Eric Dierker wrote:
> 
> Respectfully I submit that if the clear results of this wg's analysis is
> discarded, and there is the resulting lack of faith in how the internet is
> managed, Mr. Nader may well obtain the support he needs to move this concept
> forward.  It is conceivable that the failure to share power may result in
> complete loss of power.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Phil King wrote:
> 
> > Glad you're back Mr. Sondow,
> >
> > This is just exactly the oposite of what the internet needs.  ICANN is a
> > first, fledgeling step away from USG control, we are attempting to work it
> > away from US centric control to a viable entity out of National and
> > traditional Corp/Commercial dominance.  Hopefully this will go the way of
> > Mr. Nader's last bid for power.
> >
> > Phil in Butte, America
> >
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html