Re: [wg-review] Re: [Comment Please] Set timetable again or Review WG

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

> It is being decided by the WG members - Joop is running the election
> from his polling booth and we will find out the results in a day or
> so.  The four candidates have merely swapped some ideas (co-operation
> instead of competition - what the Net is about).

OK.

> I have to say I am getting very concerned about the lack of clear
> direction from the Names Council to this working group.  I am not
> criticising any individual but we have had contradictory messages a
> number of times from different NC members.

That has been NC.
To be more precisely, NC has been composed of 

    - those who know where they are
    - those who have little interest in where they are
    - few who have pointed out that NC needs more improvement

If few thinks it's impossible to make those who have different views 
persuaded, this review working group does not exist.

Right now, this group has some of Board's supports together with 
some NC members' supports, which is a big progress in itself.

Therefore, the leadership of this group is quite important and influential.
Hope you can play such a role as core of this group.
 
> Theresa's last post seemed to have made it very clear that our
> deadline is still the 15th of January and no extension has been
> granted, despite being told earlier we have had an extension.  I have
> e-mailed Theresa directly to try and ascertain if there is some
> flexibility there.  If there is not it really seems rather a waste of
> some good ideas and effort.  

If you give up, that's your own choice. However, if you keep being 
patient enough as someone who is responsible for what you are for, 
you can reap something. Hope you can achieve what this group wants to.

> The fact we also got contradictory terms of reference at the beginning
> and we have had the Xmas holidays all combine to a set of
> circumstances which are almost impossible to overcome.  However we
> will try our best.

Yes, that should be the spirit!
If you are supposed to lead this group.....

Looking forward to hearing from you about your own outputs,
I roughly draw Jan. 15th's report format.

1. Executive Summary - by yj

    - Staus of review WG
    - Discussion Issues from Dec. 23 until Jan 14.
    - Outlook of review WG
    - Proposal to Review TF and NC
        a) Proposal to Review TF
        b) Proposal to NC

2. Questionaire answers by for of you (?)

    Can you give me more specific info on who does what?
    As soon as it is clear, let me organize the structure.

3. Various Poll result (expected from Greg)

4. Appendix 1. 2. ..... provided by members of this group.

Thanks,
YJ

> DPF
> ________________________________________________________________________
> <david at farrar dot com>
> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
> ICQ 29964527
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html